Reviewed: Feb. 15, 2005

This was pretty good and very easy. I made some changes to make it a healthier meal: I used thick, boneless pork chops, skipped the whole dredging/frying part, I used the 98% fat free soup, 2 cans of evaporated skim milk and added other seasonings. The meat was so tender! I will definitely make this again.

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
44 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

sweetaddiction

Cooking Level: Expert

Living In: Shreveport, Louisiana, USA

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Jan. 19, 2005

Wonderfully tender meat that fell off the fork. I used boneless chops and skipped the onion. I also replaced the flour with Italian seasoned breadcrumbs and fried them for 5 min on each side in vegetable oil. They turned out great and I'll keep this as a favorite.

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
2 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

JULIETSBUTTERFLY

Cooking Level: Expert

Home Town: Augusta, Georgia, USA

Living In: Athens, Georgia, USA

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Jan. 16, 2005

OK: Here's my take on this recipe. Salt & pepper the chops before dredging them in flour. No egg necessary. After browning, put in slow cooker. To drippings in pan, saute 12 oz. sliced, fresh mushrooms. Then add 1 can of cream of mushroom soup, 1-1/2 cans of milk, then 1 packet of onion soup mix. Mix ingredients and bring to boil, then add to slow cooker. I used six thick, boneless chops and had more than enough gravy. Fork tender, no need for a knife.

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
82 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

gail

Home Town: Brookfield, Wisconsin, USA

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Nov. 6, 2004

We loved this recipe. We did what others suggest and skipped the egg/flour thing as well as added some spices and seasonings like onion/garlic powder. I had the perfect amount of gravy when following the recipe exactly.

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

BRECKYNPAIGE

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Jul. 28, 2004

This was a good recipe but my famly thought it lacked a little something in terms of flair. It was good nonetheless!!!

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

DJEASTER

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Jun. 3, 2004

This was a good old fashioned hearty meal! My husband and so did the restof myfamily!!!!!!!!!

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

Reeseepeesee

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: May 10, 2004

They were dry, but tasty. Made a lot of "gravy" which was good on the mashed potatoes I made to go along with it. I didn't use as much onion as the recipe called for.

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

MADAHARI

Cooking Level: Intermediate

Living In: Chester, New Hampshire, USA

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: May 1, 2004

I loved it! The chops came out nice and tender!!

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

AprilRenee417

Living In: Windsor Mill, Maryland, USA

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Mar. 25, 2004

So good. I cut the recipe in half and left out the onion. I used a thick boneless pork chop and they were sooo tender. My husband and I loved them!

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

KLUTZ7843

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Feb. 29, 2004

I used a med. onion and followed the recipe exactly. Found the onion flavour too strong. Was ok but I don't think I will make this again, too many recipes to try. Michele, cambridge ontario

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

MICHK35

Cooking Level: Expert

Home Town: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Living In: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Feb. 22, 2004

I left mine in the slow cooker about 8 hours. The pork was very tender. WAY too tender for a pork chop. The flavor of the onions and soup was really strong. The sauce was thick and gooey. I did not like this at all. The flavors were pretty bad. I wont make this again. However, I think cooking pork for barbeque or something would be a good idea as it becomes so tender.

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

SNOWWHITE2

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Feb. 21, 2004

I followed the directions exactly and I also did not think that the pork chops were very tender and I had them on low for 8 hours. Maybe it was because I used a thick cut pork chop. The only one who did not complain was my husband who thought it was okay. Sorry

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

LESLEYfromWI

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Feb. 7, 2004

This was amazing. I followed the recipe almost exactly unlike other reviewers using the same amount of milk, soup, and shortening. I did add some incredients such as fresh sliced mushrooms at the beginning. In the flour mixture I added some season salt and pepper. I also add a bay leaf, 1 tsp. tyme and sage the last hour. The pork chops I used were boneless and thinly sliced and next time I think I will use thicker sliced chops because these were so tender that they basically disentigrated. These were the only pork chops I had on hand. I served this with mashed potatos (utilizing the gravy of this recipe) and green beans. My husband is a picky eater and he raved about this recipe. Thank you!

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
2 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

IAMHEATHER

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Jan. 27, 2004

The recipe turned out very good, but it needed a little less onion.

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

WENDYWOOD

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Jan. 27, 2004

The pork turned out very tender and flavorful. It wasn't a favorite meal, but satisfying.

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

PSNEED5

Cooking Level: Intermediate

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Jan. 22, 2004

I didn't have shortning, plus I thought it was more fatty than margerine so that's what I used. Very tender and tasty!

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

CHARITYLEN

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Jan. 3, 2004

I tried this recipe with the suggestions of some of the other reviews. The pork chops were very tender and had lots of flavor. I will definetely make this one again

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

BLUESTINGRAY

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Oct. 27, 2003

I used 1/2 soup can of milk instead of the larger quantity called for. My husband loved this recipe! Will definitely make again.

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

BSA650

Cooking Level: Intermediate

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Oct. 25, 2003

My chops turned out quite dry for some reason (I browned them quickly first - could that be why?). The meat was tender - falling apart, but dry at the same time, if that makes any sense. The gravy and onions are wonderful though. I may substitute with another kind of meat next time.

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful