Reviewed: Nov. 17, 2009

I made these with the 6oz of chololate as was recommended. They are delicious! A 13x9 pan was gone in one day. 7 adults acting like they were 5 years old! Ver good indeed.

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

desertdessert

Cooking Level: Expert

Living In: Issaquah, Washington, USA

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Nov. 16, 2009

Didn't really do it for me... followed another reviewers suggestion and added extra chocolate. Was really not brownie like at all, just turned out like a pan of chocolate fudge.

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

Tara V.

Cooking Level: Intermediate

Living In: Fleetwood, Pennsylvania, USA

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Nov. 15, 2009

Fantastic! I omitted the walnuts and added peppermint chocolate baking chips instead. Yummy!

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

michelle

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Nov. 11, 2009

These are great-not cakey-just a bit gooey, just like we like them. I only had three squares of bakers chocolate-so I used an extra 2tbls of butter and 1/4cup of powdered coco. Turned out great. Next time I'll be sure to have enough bakers chocolate on hand- because I know I'll make these again. Great recipe- beats the box for sure.

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

dazeedoo

Cooking Level: Intermediate

Living In: Lebanon, Oregon, USA

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Nov. 9, 2009

My first chocolate fudge brownies and it was a success! As I didn't have a 9x13 inch pan, I used a 8x8 inch pan instead. I used only 3 eggs, and I cut down the sugar to only 300g, 2 teaspoon vanilla extract. IT'S PERFECT!!! Crispy on the top and sides, and fudgey in the middle! All my friends and family LOVE IT!!! I'd baked 3 times already, and everytime it turns out well! Eat it with vanilla ice-cream, it's freaking GOOD! I will definitely stick to this recipe! :D

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

babyserene

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Nov. 8, 2009

I took into account the suggestions of previous reviewers and reduced the amount of sugar and eggs, I also replaced the walnuts with the chocolate chips. I was making these brownies for gifts, so I doubled the recipe and then divided the batter between three 8" x 8" disposable aluminum pans and cooked them for roughly 30mins. While these brownies had the best texture of any brownie I've made (they were thick and chewy with a nice crisp to the top and sides) they were also so rich they were nearly inedible. Brownies are usually wolfed down around this house, but the 8" x 8" pan I baked on Friday afternoon is still 1/3 intact on Sunday afternoon. I haven't decided if I'll ever use this recipe again. If I do, I will definately scale back the sugar even more, omit the chocolate chips, and perhaps even scale back on the unsweetened chocolate.

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

BLUEBECCAH

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Oct. 31, 2009

Excellent! These are almost as easy as making a box mix - literally a few minutes and it was done. I followed another reviewers suggestion and only used 2 eggs, which made these nice and fudgy/chewy. Great stuff!

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

Kellygrrrl

Cooking Level: Expert

Home Town: Willingboro, New Jersey, USA

Living In: Los Angeles, California, USA

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Oct. 28, 2009

I followed other’s suggestions and used only 2 eggs. Baking time took almost for 50 minutes ! It was hard as a rock!! Couldn’t even cut or chew. Maybe next time I would just follow the original recipe…

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

sparkle

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Oct. 7, 2009

I found these brownies to be too greasy and oversweet. I think cutting the grease and sugar in half may be a better choice. I made them in a 9x9 pan for my family of six and after five days there was still plenty of brownies. That's telling. Still searching for a great brownie recipe.

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

melissa

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Oct. 3, 2009

these brownies were really good but i would make one adjustment. it says a 13x9 inch pan but do NOT do this, the brownies burn really quickly and turn brittle and i had to throw out half of them. i would recommend a 9x9 or a little bigger but not too big. I tried making them again with the adjustment and they were perfect. i also recommend buying some of those caramel squared and chopping them up, pouring half the batter in, then sprinkle about 1 1/2 - 2 cups of those, then the rest of the batter. they tasted soooooo good!!

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

littlebaker12

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Sep. 28, 2009

These are very moist and fudgy. This made a large pan full which is a plus when you end up with brownies as good as these! Thanks for the great recipe k. anderson!

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

~TxCin~ILove2Ck

Cooking Level: Intermediate

Home Town: Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA

Living In: Corpus Christi, Texas, USA

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Sep. 25, 2009

I've made these brownies for my family a few times and they always get rave reviews! Like some of the other posters i cut the eggs down to 2. They are moist and fudgy and absolutely perfect!

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

april1975

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Sep. 25, 2009

I made these for my sons bakesale...I had requests to purchase them by the tray for upcoming events!! Thanks you so much for sharing!

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

Michelle.Kutz

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Sep. 14, 2009

I followed reviewers' advice and reduced the eggs to 2. I added white chocolate chips in place of nuts, but otherwise followed the recipe. The sugar never dissolved, so the final brownies had an unpleasant grainy texture. Great taste! Horrible texture. It reminded me of the time I tried to make real fudge, and it ended up grainy too; so maybe if you are good at making homemade fudge this will work for you. I may try this again using 4 eggs and superfine sugar. (The kind that is finer than regular, but not powdered).

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

Sarahtea

Cooking Level: Intermediate

Living In: Dallas, Texas, USA

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Sep. 7, 2009

Really yummy brownies! I did add chocolate chips to the batter but i made mine in mini muffin pans so they were bit size!I also only used 2 eggs.

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

Bert

Cooking Level: Intermediate

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Sep. 3, 2009

YUMMY, these brownies are delicious! I used 3 eggs, 4 1oz squares of unsweetened chocolate and 1 1oz square of semi-sweet and they are very rich. I cooked them in a 9X9 for 30 minutes. They are quite thick, so next time I might try a 9X13, but we loved them, definitely a keeper.

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

Laura

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Aug. 30, 2009

I really, really like these! I used the 12T cocoa powder/4T butter substitution since I didn't have any squares of chocolate. Easy recipe to follow and they came out great! I also only used 3 eggs and thought the 'fudginess' was spot on. Thanks for the recipe!

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
1 user found this review helpful

Reviewer:

hbuie

Cooking Level: Intermediate

Home Town: Lytle, Texas, USA

Living In: Savannah, Missouri, USA

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Aug. 26, 2009

These brownies came out very well. Very gooey and chocolaty. I dont agree with a lot of the reviews saying they are too sweet. They are NOT too sweet. They are just how a brownie should be. I followed the recipe exactly except used only three eggs cuz thats all i had. They are a bit too gooey in the middle. The middle didnt bake as well. But they really do taste good. I liked them!

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

lisamarie

Cooking Level: Intermediate

Home Town: Manteca, California, USA

Living In: Misawa, Aomori, Japan

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Aug. 25, 2009

These brownies have a great fudge taste, once you alter the recipe! I only added 3 eggs, 1/2 cup of semi-sweet chocolate chips and 2 teaspoons of vanilla. Then I got the fudgy consistency that I was looking for! Will definately make again!

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful

Reviewer:

saradzaman

My Profile | Cooks I Like | Reviews
Photos | Recipes | Blog

Reviewed: Aug. 24, 2009

I don't know what I did wrong, but these certainly shouldn't be called FUDGE brownies. They were more spongy than anything. They still tasted good, but I don't think I'll tell people they're supposed to be FUDGE brownies...

Was this review helpful? [ YES ]
0 users found this review helpful